Weekly Geopolitical Mining Review
Written for senior executives, investors and policymakers, our Weekly connects the week’s key developments in mining and critical minerals with shifts in geopolitics, policy and markets. We explain their implications for investment, industrial strategy and supply chains, providing a global perspective for informed decisions.
Clarity. Strategy. Global context.
Explore the Weekly Geopolitical Mining Review
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of April 6–12, 2026
This week, the U.S. Department of Energy, Canada Growth Fund’s backing of Nouveau Monde Graphite, Rock Tech’s Ontario converter push, Argentina’s glacier-law reform, the Australia–U.S. financing lane, and…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 30 – April 5, 2026
This week’s Geopolitical Mining Weekly examines how mineral security is moving from strategic language to operating architecture. From Section 232 changes and allied coordination to the BHP–CMRG dispute,…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 23–29, 2026
This week, critical mineral security moved through concrete instruments rather than broad strategy language: plants, equity, licenses, trade architecture, and rising cost pressure. The common signal is clear:…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 16-22, 2026
This week, critical minerals moved further into market design, processing capacity, project execution, and legitimacy pressure, as governments, companies, and even faith-based actors shaped the next phase of…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 9–15, 2026
Critical minerals moved deeper into processing, project acceleration, and finance backed supply security this week, as the U.S., Argentina, Indonesia, Greenland, and Metalysis showed how real supply is…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 2–8, 2026
Critical minerals moved deeper into delivery architecture this week, as Canada, the U.S., the EU, Malaysia and Australia all showed that real advantage now depends on capital, processing,…
GM Weekly
Subscribe to GM Weekly