Weekly Geopolitical Mining Review
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of April 13–19, 2026
This week showed how mineral security is being built through sharper instruments: demand coordination in Europe, midstream support in the United States, rising sulfur risk in copper and nickel, and a stronger development finance push across the value chain.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of April 6–12, 2026
This week, the U.S. Department of Energy, Canada Growth Fund’s backing of Nouveau Monde Graphite, Rock Tech’s Ontario converter push, Argentina’s glacier-law reform, the Australia–U.S. financing lane, and the Contrecœur port expansion all showed the same shift: critical mineral security is becoming a question of execution. Processing, finance, conversion, legal frameworks, and logistics are increasingly…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 30 – April 5, 2026
This week’s Geopolitical Mining Weekly examines how mineral security is moving from strategic language to operating architecture. From Section 232 changes and allied coordination to the BHP–CMRG dispute, Rhyolite Ridge’s court win, and the Chemaf transaction in Congo, the field is increasingly being shaped through tariffs, market structure, legal durability, and asset-level positioning.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 23–29, 2026
This week, critical mineral security moved through concrete instruments rather than broad strategy language: plants, equity, licenses, trade architecture, and rising cost pressure. The common signal is clear: supply security is increasingly being built through the mechanisms that determine whether materials can actually be financed, processed, moved, and sustained.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 16-22, 2026
This week, critical minerals moved further into market design, processing capacity, project execution, and legitimacy pressure, as governments, companies, and even faith-based actors shaped the next phase of supply security.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 9–15, 2026
Critical minerals moved deeper into processing, project acceleration, and finance backed supply security this week, as the U.S., Argentina, Indonesia, Greenland, and Metalysis showed how real supply is increasingly shaped by industrial capacity, strategic funding, and security logic.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of March 2–8, 2026
Critical minerals moved deeper into delivery architecture this week, as Canada, the U.S., the EU, Malaysia and Australia all showed that real advantage now depends on capital, processing, legitimacy and institutional speed.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of February 23 – March 1, 2026
This week’s note tracks how critical minerals are moving from strategy language into rules, enforcement, and supply discipline: USTR’s push toward a plurilateral critical minerals deal, rising USMCA review uncertainty, Zimbabwe’s export ban and its immediate lithium price signal in China, a new Indonesia-Gabon rare earth axis, and Argentina’s glacier law reform debate as a…
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly | Week of 16–22 February 2026
This week’s Geopolitical Mining Weekly tracks how new US/Mexico/Canada links, US–Philippines and US–Argentina deals, an India–Brazil critical minerals pact, China’s rare earths price power and Canada’s use of public capital and fast track schemes are reshaping who controls critical minerals – not just in the ground, but in the rules, prices and institutions around them.
-
Geopolitical Mining Weekly|Week of 9 – 15 February 2026
This week’s Geopolitical Mining Weekly connects Indonesia’s new state led rare earths strategy, Codelco’s governance response at El Teniente, the Concordia tragedy in Mexico, Verisk Maplecroft’s view of South America as the West’s “safest bet” for critical minerals, and a debate on whether NI 43-101 is still sufficient, to show how system design, governance and…